Table 4.
Quality of quasi-experimental studies included in the systematic review
| Study | Selectiona | Comparabilitya | Outcomea | Risk of bias | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1a) Int. group truly representative |
1b) Int. group somewhat representative |
2a) Cont. group from same community |
3a) Secure record used |
3b) Structured interview used |
1a) Important factor controlled |
1b) Additional factor controlled |
1a) Blind assessment |
1b) Record linkage |
2a) Sufficient follow-up period |
3a) Complete follow-up |
3b) Attrition unlikely to affect bias |
||
| Arnetz & Theorell [60] | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | High |
| Baumgarten et al [61] | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Moderate |
| Evans & Jaureguy [73] | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | High |
| Fujiwara et al [74] | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | High |
| Martina & Stevens [75] | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | High |
| Rosen & Rosen [76] | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | High |
| Stevens & van Tilburg [77] | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | High |
| Toseland et al [53] | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | High |
| White et al 1999 [62] | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | High |
| Winningham & Pike [63] | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | High |
| Bogat & Jason [78] | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | High |
| Fokkema & Knipscheer [79] | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | High |
| Mulligan & Bennett [80] | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | High |
| Rook & Sorkin [81] | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | High |
| Toseland & Smith [54] | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | High |
| Bergman-Evans [65] | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | High |
a Refer to Wells et al [48] for full description of these categories