Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 May 5;81(3):e101–e109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.013

Table 3.

Proportional Hazards Regression Models for Local Regional Failure

Gender (Male vs. Female[RL1]) Marital Status (Unpartnered vs. Partnered[RL1]) Race (Non-White vs. White[RL1])

Treatment Arm Adjusted Hazard Ratio2 (95% CI1) p-value Adjusted Hazard Ratio2 (95% CI1) p-value Adjusted Hazard Ratio2 (95% CI1) p-value
9003: Arm 1 – SFX 0.97 (0.68, 1.36) 0.84 1.22 (0.89, 1.67) 0.21 1.51 (1.10, 2.09) 0.01
9003: Arm 2 – HFX 0.97 (0.62, 1.51) 0.88 1.28 (0.90, 1.82) 0.17 0.98 (0.67, 1.42) 0.90
9003: Arm 3 – AHFX-S 1.28 (0.83, 1.97) 0.27 1.09 (0.79, 1.50) 0.60 1.20 (0.85, 1.68) 0.30
9003: Arm 4 – AFX-C 1.21 (0.76, 1.93) 0.41 1.17 (0.83, 1.64) 0.37 1.59 (0.76, 1.59) 0.63
9111: Arm 1 – I+RT 0.79 (0.48, 1.31) 0.36 1.34 (0.86, 2.09) 0.20 1.40 (0.87, 2.25) 0.16
9111: Arm 2 – CRT 2.56 (0.998, 6.59) 0.052 1.31 (0.76, 2.27) 0.34 1.51 (0.85, 2.69) 0.16
9111: Arm 3 – RT Alone 1.57 (0.87, 2.82) 0.13 0.93 (0.61, 1.44) 0.75 1.18 (0.75, 1.87) 0.48
9703: Arm 1 – Cispl/5-FU 0.94 (0.45, 1.97) 0.86 1.84 (0.95, 3.55) 0.07 1.25 (0.59, 2.67) 0.57
9703: Arm 2 – Hydroxy/5-FU 4.25 (0.995, 18.17) 0.052 0.89 (0.48, 1.63) 0.70 1.03 (0.52, 2.07) 0.93
9703: Arm 3 – Cispl/Taxol 0.74 (0.32, 1.70) 0.48 1.24 (0.60, 2.58) 0.56 0.98 (0.44, 2.17) 0.96

Chi Square T.S. (Q) = 11.931 Chi Square T.S. (Q) = 4.662 Chi Square T.S. (Q) = 4.772
p-value = 0.96 p-value = 0.54 p-value = 0.56

Pooled HR3 1.10 (0.93, 1.30) -- 1.19 (1.04, 1.35) -- 1.22 (1.06, 1.41) --
1

CI = Confidence Interval; RL = Reference Level

2

Adjusted for: T-stage (RL: T1-T3), N-stage (RL: N0-N1-N2a), KPS (RL: 60–80), primary site (RL: oropharynx; 9003 and 9703 only), and age (continuous).

3

This is a pooled estimate.