Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 2;58(6):618–626. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.042

Table 3.

Multivariable models assessing the association between sex/hormone status, androgens and NT-proBNP concentrations

Model without FT Model with FT

Association with log NT-proBNP Beta* (SE) P value Beta* (SE) P value
Entire sample (N=3484)
Men −1.12 (0.05) <0.0001 −0.51 (0.14) 0.0004
Postmenopausal women without HRT −0.46 (0.09) <0.0001 −0.35 (0.09) 0.0001
Premenopausal women without HC −0.25 (0.05) <0.0001 −0.14 (0.05) 0.008
Postmenopausal women with HRT −0.34 (0.14) 0.015 −0.24 (0.14) 0.083
Premenopausal women with HC Referent Referent Referent Referent
Log FT - - −0.27 (0.06) <0.0001

Women only (N=1613)
Postmenopausal women without HRT −0.35 (0.09) 0.0001 −0.17 (0.10) 0.073
Premenopausal women without HC −0.22 (0.05) <0.0001 −0.05 (0.06) 0.385
Postmenopausal women with HRT −0.25 (0.14) 0.069 −0.09 (0.14) 0.499
Premenopausal women with HC Referent Referent Referent Referent
Log FT - - −0.43 (0.07) <0.0001

FT, free testosterone; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; HC, hormonal contraceptives

*

Beta coefficients represent the mean difference in log NT-proBNP in the corresponding sex/hormone status group compared to premenopausal women receiving HC (referent group), or mean change in log NT-proBNP per 1 SD difference in log FT, adjusted for age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, serum creatinine, antihypertensive medications, diabetes mellitus, and smoking