Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Serv. 2011;6(1):18–33. doi: 10.5042/jcs.2011.0123

Resilience Project Competence Measure *

Item
Number
Label Item Description (see Coding Manual) Good Work Acceptable Work Needs Work
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
1 Emotional
responsiveness
Ability to respond empathically to the child’s
statements and behaviors by reflecting and labeling
feelings
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

2 Boundaries Ability to maintain appropriate psychological and
physical boundaries that promote the child’s autonomy
and competence
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

3 Language/ verbal
communication
Ability to use developmentally appropriate language
that clearly conveys both the concepts/skills and the
implementer’s empathic connection to the child (e.g.,
warm, enthusiastic tone, use of specific praise)
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

4 Pacing/ focus Ability to strategically and sensitively adjust the pace
of the session to the needs of the child while remaining
focused on relevant aspects of the session content
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

5 Active learning Ability to effectively use interactive strategies, such as
demonstrations and role-plays, to introduce, teach and
reinforce concepts and skills
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

6 Individualizing /
Tailoring
Ability to use flexibly tailor teaching and
concepts/skills so that they are meaningful for the child
and his/her context
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

7 In vivo Ability to use spontaneous material such as the child’s
presentation, story, or observations to introduce/teach
/reinforce skills or concepts
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
©

Rochester Resilience Project, University of Rochester

*

Contact authors for complete measure and scoring