Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 5.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 5;34(4):287–294. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.07.008

Table 2.

Adjusted Mean “Direction to Mental Health” as a Function of District Saturation, District Resources, and Officer CIT Training (CIT versus Non-CIT)


OFFICER
CIT
NON-CIT
POOLED
HIGH SATURATION
 HIGH RESOURCES (District B) .56 (.40) .38 (.38) .47(.39)+
 LOW RESOURCES (District A) .72 (.40) .68 (.39) .70(.39)c
 POOLED (District B & A) .64 (.41) .53 (.41) .59(.41)
LOW SATURATION
 HIGH RESOURCES (District D) .96 (.19) .42 (.43) .69(.39)+
 LOW RESOURCES (District C) .47 (.49) .45 (.41) .46(.44)c
 POOLED (District D & C) .71 (.39) .44 (.41) .57(.43)
POOLED
 HIGH RESOURCES (District B & D) .76 (.40)b .40 (.39)b .58(.40)
 LOW RESOURCES (District A & C) .59 (.42) .57 (.42) .58(.43)
 POOLED (All Districts) .68 (.41)a .48 (.41)a

Note. Means are adjusted for the control variables. Raw score standard deviations are shown in parentheses.

a,b,c

notations identify sets of paired cells where the mean difference in “Direct to Mental Health” was significant a,c p.<.05,b p.<.01

+

Paired cell mean difference p.<.10