Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 11;9:87. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-87

Table 8.

Subsequent, interval, repeat diagnostic breast biopsy procedures that were later done in a delayed fashion from the same anatomical site of the affected breast after having a benign finding on the original ultrasound-guided diagnostic breast biopsy procedure.

8-gauge 14-gauge All cases P-value
All cases in which the patient underwent an interval, repeat diagnostic breast biopsy procedure done at a delayed time after having a benign finding on the original ultrasound-guided diagnostic breast biopsy 9 (1.2%) 15 (2.1%) 24 (1.7%) 0.211
Median time to interval, repeat diagnostic breast biopsy procedure (months, range) 12.4 (4.7-45.4) 9.8 (2.8-34.1) 12.0 (2.8-45.4) 0.373
Reason for interval, repeat diagnostic breast biopsy procedure ---------
 Residual BIRADS 4 ultrasound lesion 6 (66.7%) 7 (46.7%) 12 (50.0%) ---------
 Residual BIRADS 4 MRI lesion 1 (11.1%) 0 (0%) 1 (4.2%) ---------
 Developed new BIRADS 4 mammographic lesion 2 (22.2%) 0 (0%) 2 (8.3%) ---------
 Patient's request 0 (0%) 8 (53.3%) 8 (33.3%) ---------
Type of interval, repeat diagnostic breast biopsy procedure ---------
 Surgical excision 3 (33.3%) 7 (46.7%) 10 (41.7%) ---------
 Ultrasound-guided 8-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy 5 (55.5%) 7 (46.7%) 12 (50.0%) ---------
 Ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core biopsy 0 (0%) 1 (6.7%) 1 (4.2%) ---------
 MRI guided 10-gauge biopsy 1 (11.1%) 0 (0%) 1 (4.2%) ---------
Frequency in which a benign breast finding from the original ultrasound-guided diagnostic breast biopsy was determined to represent an invasive carcinoma at the time of the interval, repeat diagnostic breast biopsy procedure done at a delayed time 0/9 (0%) 1/15 (6.7%) 1/24 (4.2%) 1.000