Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar 31;30(5):381–386. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0077-z

Table 4.

Comparative analysis between the present study and our historic control groups

  Stem design Ra (μm) Number of hips Average followup (years) Osteolysis/radiolucent lines (number of cases and %) Revisions for aseptic loosening (number of cases and %)
Present study VerSys CT 0.05 54 6.1 4 (7.2%) 0 (0%)
Historic control groups VerSys Satin (25) 0.4–0.5 138 5.2 3 (2.2%) 0 (0%)
VerSys Rough (25) 1.4–2 64 5.7 10 (15.6%) 8 (12.5%)