Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 15;12(4):367–377. doi: 10.4161/cbt.12.4.16908

Table 2.

Linear mixed effects modeling of TIL infiltration, performed on a cohort of 50 patients to estimate the magnitude of the difference between intraepithelial and stromal TIL infiltration at primary (ovarian) and metastatic sites

Intraepithelial TILs
CD3 CD8 FoxP3
Site Avg. Diff. (95% CI) p value Avg. diff. (95% CI) p value Avg. diff. (95% CI) p value
Primaries (ovaries) (ref) (ref) (ref) (ref) (ref) (ref)
Metastases −0.07 (−0.30, 0.17) 0.57 −0.09 (−0.29, 0.12) 0.40 0.12 (−0.14, 0.17) 0.37
Significant global effects? No, p = 0.30 No, p = 0.35 No, p = 0.32
Stromal TILs
CD3 CD8 FoxP3
Site Avg. Diff. (95% CI) p value Avg. diff. (95% CI) p value Avg. diff. (95% CI) p value
Primaries (ovaries) (ref) (ref) (ref) (ref) (ref) (ref)
Metastases 0.41 (0.21, 0.62) 0.020 0.39 (0.20, 0.57) 0.00002 0.22 (0.04, 0.47) 0.086
Significant global effects? Yes, p = 0.0003 Yes, p = 0.0001 Yes, p = 0.0003