Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2011 Jul 1;40(4):1196–1213. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.03.008

Table A2.

Regression Results from Logistic Models Predicting “Doubling Up”

VARIABLE (1) By Lifetime Incarceration and Covariates (2) By Incarceration History (Y1–Y5), demographic/socioeconomic covariates (3) Incarceration and Housing Instability, Controlling for Y1 Instability (4) Examining Incarceration and Earnings (5) Examining Incarceration/Public Housing Interaction
Odds Ratio SE Odds Ratio SE Odds Ratio SE Odds Ratio SE Odds Ratio SE
Incarceration (Lifetime) 2.17 [0.416]***
Incarceration (Y1–Y5) 1.48 [0.292]* 1.38 [0.282] 1.29 [0.269] 1.38 [0.324]
Public Housing (Y1) 0.98 [0.270]
Incarc (Y1–Y5) × PH (Y1) 1.01 [0.445]
Incarceration (before Y1) 1.64 [0.318]* 1.61 [0.325] * 1.57 [0.318]* 1.61 [0.326]*
Y5 Earnings (logged} 0.92 [0.021]***
Y1 insecurity: skipped payment 1.73 [0.420] * 1.76 [0.423]* 1.73 [0.417]*
Y1 insecurity: evicted 1.13 [0.586] 1.16 [0.596] 1.13 [0.587]
Y1 insecurity: “doubled up” 1.28 [0.338] 1.30 [0.342] 1.28 [0.339]
Y1 insecurity: homeless 2.18 [0.913] 2.33 [0.953]* 2.19 [0.921]
Y1 insecurity: lived with others, no rent 0.63 [0.258] 0.64 [0.256] 0.63 [0.258]
Y1 insecurity: moved >1×/year 2.22 [0.528] *** 2.19 [0.519]*** 2.22 [0.532]***
Y1 insecurity: any insecurity
Black 1.94 [0.519]* 1.60 [0.451] 1.77 [0.516] * 1.71 [0.501] 1.78 [0.521]*
Hispanic 1.52 [0.513] 1.19 [0.420] 1.19 [0.431] 1.13 [0.408] 1.19 [0.434]
Other 2.10 [0.811] 1.75 [0.716] 1.88 [0.775] 1.65 [0.696] 1.91 [0.787]
Foreign born 0.38 [0.175]* 0.42 [0.202] 0.50 [0.243] 0.53 [0.260] 0.50 [0.244]
Age (at baseline) 0.98 [0.012] 0.98 [0.013] 0.97 [0.013] 0.98 [0.013]
Cognitive Ability 1.04 [0.034] 1.06 [0.036] 1.06 [0.037] 1.06 [0.038] 1.06 [0.037]
Grew up with both parents 0.77 [0.145] 0.96 [0.188] 0.91 [0.184] 0.93 [0.189] 0.91 [0.183]
Maternal history of depression 1.65 [0.299]** 1.56 [0.185]* 1.48 [0.282] * 1.48 [0.284]* 1.48 [0.282]*
Impulsivity 1.36 [0.145]** 1.23 [0.288] 1.27 [0.141] * 1.24 [0.140] 1.27 [0.143]*
Cohabiting at baseline 1.23 [0.341] 1.17 [0.327] 1.13 [0.315] 1.17 [0.327]
Nonresident at baseline 1.16 [0.354] 1.07 [0.330] 1.04 [0.319] 1.06 [0.327]
Baseline education: <HS 0.99 [0.195] 1.00 [0.198] 0.96 [0.192] 1.00 [0.200]
Baseline education: some college 0.69[0.177] 0.72 [0.184] 0.75 [0.191] 0.72 [0.184]
Baseline education: college grad 0.16 [0.117]* 0.18 [0.136] * 0.20 [0.150]* 0.18 [0.135]*
Employed at baseline 0.81 [0.182] 0.79 [0.181] 0.87 [0.206] 0.79 [0.181]
Substance use at baseline 1.12 [0.277] 1.01 [0.265] 1.01 [0.271] 1.01 [0.265]
Reports good health at baseline 1.00 [0.200] 1.02 [0.207] 1.04 [0.212] 1.02 [0.208]
*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001

City FE and missing data indicators included in model, but not table.