Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2007 Spring;19(2):497–521. doi: 10.1017/S0954579407070241

Table 2.

Predicting Anhedonia Over Time From Recent Interpersonal Stress, Family Disruption, and Interpersonal Stress × Family Disruption Interaction

Predictors β t ΔR2
Pubertal Girls
(n = 111)		 Step 1 Anhedonia .34   3.43*** .21
Step 2 Stress .58   3.60***
Family Disruption −.12 −1.31 .05
Step 3 Stress ×
Family Disruption −.36 −2.38* .04
Prepubertal Girls
(n = 70)		 Step 1 Anhedonia .53   4.91*** .41
Step 2 Stress .25   1.56 .03
Family Disruption .00     .04 .03
Step 3 Stress ×
Family Disruption −.07   −.48 .00
Pubertal Boys
(n = 93)		 Step 1 Anhedonia .36   3.59** .13
Step 2 Stress −.10   −.80 .01
Family Disruption .11   1.04 .01
Step 3 Stress ×
Family Disruption .06     .49 .00
Prepubertal Boys
(n = 102)		 Step 1 Anhedonia .37   3.77*** .18
Step 2 Stress .32   2.07* .01
Family Disruption −.01   −.14 .01
Step 3 Stress ×
Family Disruption −.29 −1.99* .03
*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001.

Note. βs and ts represent standardized coefficients and t statistics at the final step. ΔR2 represents percent of variance accounted for at each step.