Table 2. Statistics of support values estimated from three combined datasets.

		87 taxa			63 taxa			48 taxa
Node no.	Node description	BI	ML	MP	BI	ML	MP	BI	ML	MP
1	Aphidinae+Pterocommatinae	1.00	100	100	1.00	100	100	1.00	100	100
2	Macrosiphini+Aphidini	0.98	65	82	0.98	63	83	1.00	69	69
3	Aphidini	1.00	95	82	1.00	98	89	1.00	96	77
4	Macrosiphini	1.00	91	92	1.00	91	98	1.00	87	94
5	Pterocommatinae	1.00	100	100	1.00	100	100	1.00	100	100
11	Rhopalosiphina	1.00	86	76	1.00	84	80	1.00	82	65
12	clade sister to M. japonica	1.00	79	52	1.00	80	53	1.00	77	58
22	Aphidina	1.00	75	65	1.00	100	97	1.00	100	99
24	clade sister to A. crinosa	0.94	37	20	0.83	43	43	1.00	65	68
25	clade sister to T. aurantii	0.94	24	24	0.76	23	28	1.00	92	68
30	clade sister to Southern Hemisphere group	1.00	39	23	0.86	48	31	-	-	-
34	clade of four species groups with other spp.	0.80	29	15	0.86	35	18	1.00	41	-
35	gossypii group	1.00	97	97	1.00	100	99	1.00	100	100
61	craccivora+fabae+spiraecola groups	0.87	36	26	1.00	84	62	1.00	92	77
63	craccivora+fabae groups	1.00	42	35	1.00	50	55	0.51	43	48
64	craccivora group	1.00	98	95	1.00	100	100	-	-	-
71	fabae group	1.00	79	75	1.00	96	96	1.00	97	99

We used BI, ML, and MP analyses to compare the datasets. Node no. refers to nodes of phylogeny in Figure 2.