Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Qual Life Res. 2011 Apr 3;20(10):1655–1662. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9896-5

Table 1.

Characteristics of the participantsa

Total (N = 338)
Age (years) 53 ± 11
Race—no. (%)
 White 262 (77.5)
 Black 64 (18.9)
 Other 12 (3.6)
Education beyond high school—no. (%) 293 (86.7)
Relationship status—no. (%)
 Married or living with partner 256 (75.7)
 Single, widowed, or divorced 82 (24.3)
Annual household income—no./total no. (%)
 <$40,000 72/268 (26.9)
 $40,000–$99,9,999 142/268 (53.0)
 $100,000 or more 54/268 (20.1)
Body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) 36 ± 6
Diabetes—no. (%) 10 (3.0)
Current smoker—no. (%) 18 (5.3)
Current alcohol use—no. (%) 228 (67.5)
Post-menopausal—no./total no. (%) 177/316 (56.0)
Self-reported health status—no. (%)
 Excellent or very good 151 (44.7)
 Good 150 (44.4)
 Fair or poor 37 (10.9)
Hysterectomy—no./total no. (%) 99/337 (29.4)
Parity 2 ± 1
Type of urinary incontinence—no. (%)b
 Stress only/stress predominant 75 (22.2)
 Urge only/urge predominant 149 (44.1)
 Mixed 114 (33.7)
Urinary incontinence episodes per week 24 ± 18
24-h involuntary urine loss (g)c 33 ± 55
Monthly or greater fecal incontinence—no. (%) 35 (10.4)
a

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (percent)

b

Type of urinary incontinence was classified according to the participant’s designation of each incontinence episode in a 7-day voiding diary

c

Involuntary urine loss was measured by the 24-h increase in pad weight