Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Mar 10;216(4):485–499. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2243-2

Table 3.

Between-group comparisons for angry or happy face condition at baseline

Group difference Talairach coordinates for peak values Area BA Volume (mm3) t value for peak values
Angry vs neutral
 HC>PBD −46, 20, 8 L inferior frontal gyrus BA 45 1,134 4.57
 HC>PBD −46, 33, 0 L inferior frontal gyrus BA 47 351 2.89
 HC>PBD 15, 8, 11 R dorsal caudate 432 3.89
Happy vs neutral
 PBD>HC 25, −1, −13 R amygdala 351 2.53
 PBD>HC 53, 35, 9 R inferior frontal gyrus BA 45/46 486 3.84
 PBD>HC −34, 23, −7 L inferior frontal gyrus BA 47 1,539 2.85
 PBD>HC 59, 8, 20 R middle frontal gyrus BA 44, 9 1,458 3.46
 PBD>HC 41, 47, 11 R middle frontal gyrus BA 10, 46 1,512 3.89
 PBD>HC −13, 59, 20 L medial frontal gyrus BA 10 837 4.82
 PBD>HC 53, −58, −7 R middle temporal gyrus BA 22 513 3.16

Talairach coordinates and t values for clusters for which there is a significant three-way interaction (corrected p<0.020 with cluster contiguity threshold) in the whole-brain ANOVA for the angry or happy face condition. The table also lists the significant group differences obtained from post hoc decomposition of the significant interaction

HC healthy control group, PBD pediatric bipolar disorder group, BA Brodmann’s area, L left, R right

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure