Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Mar 10;216(4):485–499. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2243-2

Table 5.

Within-group comparisons for angry or happy face condition at follow-up vs baseline

Talairach coordinates for peak values Area BA Volume (mm3) t value for peak values
Angry vs neutral
 PBD
  Follow-up>baseline 35, 29,−4 R inferior frontal gyrus BA 47 351 2.29
  Baseline>follow-up 29, −5, −22 R amygdala 351 2.39
  Baseline>follow-up −52, −41, 49 L inferior parietal lobule BA 40 405 3.76
 HC
  Baseline>follow-up 24, 29, −8 R VMPFC BA 47,11 378 3.91
  Baseline>follow-up −0, 42, 15 L dorsal ACC BA 32 351 3.50
  Baseline>follow-up −10, 10, 10 L dorsal caudate 729 4.85
  Baseline>follow-up −22, 16, −3 L putamen 1,485 4.18
  Baseline>follow-up −49, −67, 7 L middle temporal gyrus BA 21 783 3.77
Happy vs neutral
 PBD
  Baseline>follow-up 25, −1, −12 R amygdala 351 3.05
  Baseline>follow-up 2, 2, 20 R dorsal ACC BA 24 513 3.70
 HC
  Follow-up>baseline None None None None None
  Baseline>follow-up None None None None None

Talairach coordinates and t values for clusters for which there is a significant three-way interaction (corrected p<0.020 with cluster contiguity threshold) in the whole-brain ANOVA. The table also lists the significant within-group difference for the comparison of follow-up and baseline activation, obtained from post hoc decomposition of the significant interaction

ACC anterior cingulate cortex; VMPFC ventromedial prefrontal cortex (abbreviations are as for Table 3)

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure