Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Mar 10;216(4):485–499. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2243-2

Table 6.

Between-group comparisons for angry or happy face condition at follow-up vs baseline

Talairach coordinates for peak values Area BA Volume (mm3) t value for peak values
Angry vs neutral
 PBD>HC 35, 29, −4 R VLPFC BA 47 459 3.70
 PBD>HC −2, 18, −6 L subgenual ACC BA 24 432 2.97
 PBD>HC 23, −11, −8 R amygdala 351 2.73
 PBD>HC −10, 11, 11 L dorsal caudate BA 24 459 3.39
 HC>PBD −10, −52, 62 L precuneus BA 7 405 3.42
Happy vs neutral
 PBD>HC 53, −10, −13 R middle temporal gyrus BA 21 567 3.08

Group differences for the angry or happy face condition at baseline vs follow-up. Talairach coordinates and t values for clusters for which there is a significant three-way interaction (corrected p<0.020 with cluster contiguity threshold) in the whole-brain ANOVA. The table also lists the significant group differences obtained from post hoc decomposition of the significant interaction

ACC anterior cingulate cortex (abbreviations are as for Table 3)

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure