Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 15;11:e38.

Table 5.

Quality assessment and summary of findings for studies comparing use of platelet-rich plasma treatments against standard care for acute wounds*

Quality Assessment Summary of Findings
No of Patients Effect
No of Studies Design Quality Consistency Directness Other Modifying Factors PRP Controls Relative (95% CI) Absolute Quality Importance
Acute wounds (primary closure)
Complete wound healing
1 RCT No limitations No inconsistency No uncertainty Short follow-up 50 52 RD: −0.23 (−0.37 to −0.08) −23/100 Mod Critical
Infection
1 RCT No limitations No inconsistency No uncertainty Leg infection 70 70 RD: 0.01 (−0.09 to 0.12) 1.4/100 High Important
1 Comparative No serious limitations No inconsistency No uncertainty Leg infection; large N 560 546 RD: −0.01 (−0.01 to 0) −5.5/1000 Mod Important
2 Comparative No serious limitations No inconsistency No uncertainty Superficial infection 467 1028 RD: −0.02 (−0.06 to 0.01) −22/1000 Mod Important
1 Comparative No serious limitations No inconsistency No uncertainty Chest infection; large N; propensity scoring 571 557 OR: 0.0743 (0.0032-1.7535) Mod Important
1 Comparative No serious limitations No inconsistency No uncertainty Chest infection 382 948 RD: −0.01 (−0.02 to −0.01) 14.8/1000 Mod Important
Pain reduction
3 RCT Some serious limitations Inconsistency between studies Some uncertainty (overall vs. chest pain) Small N 63 61 WMD: −0.75 (−2.38 to 0.89) −0.75/10 Very low Important
1 RCT No serious limitations No inconsistency Some uncertainty 50 52 No difference Mod Important
1 RCT Serious limitations No inconsistency Some uncertainty Dichotomous outcomes 15 15 RD: 0 (−0.36 to 0.36) No difference Very low Important
Wound drainage/exudate
1 RCT No serious limitations No inconsistency No uncertainty Small N 26 26 WMD: 18.6 (36.92 to 0.28) 18.6 mL Low Important
1 Comparative No serious limitations No inconsistency No uncertainty Large N; propensity scoring 571 557 OR: 0.042 Mod Important
1 Comparative No serious limitations No inconsistency Some uncertainty 85 80 RD: −0.13 (−0.21 to −0.04) −13/100 Mod Important
Acute wounds (secondary closure)
Complete wound healing
1 Comparative Serious limitations No inconsistency No uncertainty Small N 16 16 RD: 0.31 (−0.02 to 0.64) 31/100 Very low Critical
Time to complete wound healing
1 RCT No serious limitations No inconsistency No uncertainty Small N 30 22 6 d Low Critical
Wound volume reduction
1 RCT No serious limitations No inconsistency No uncertainty Small N 30 22 WMD: 4.9 (3.79-6.01) 4.9 mL Mod Important
Area reduction (quotient method)
1 RCT No serious limitations No inconsistency No uncertainty Small N 32 27 WMD: 0.13 (0.08-0.18) 0.13 cm2 Mod Important
Pain
1 RCT No serious limitations Some inconsistency No uncertainty Small N 32 27 WMD: −22.2 (−31.16 to −13.28) −22.2/100 Low Important

*Mod indicates moderate; OR, odds ratio; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RD, risk difference; RR, relative risk; WMD, weighted mean difference.