Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008 Jul 15;12(2):172–176. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2008.40

Table 1.

Clinical and pathological features in men undergoing radical prostatectomy within the SEARCH database stratified by nerve sparing-technique

Nerve-sparing technique
P-value*
BNS UNS NNS
Number of patients 579 136 303
Age at surgery, mean (years) 59.977a 63.62 <0.001
Body mass index (kg m−2) 27.92 28.99 28.04 <0.001
Race (%) <0.001
 White 290 (50) 88 (65) 186 (62)
 Black 243 (42) 43 (32) 87 (29)
 Other 42 (7) 5 (4) 27 (9)
Biopsy Gleason score (%) <0.001
 <7 404 (70) 84 (62) 165 (52)
 7 145 (25) 35 (26) 92 (31)
 >7 27 (5) 16 (12) 43 (14)
Clinical stage (%) <0.001
 <T2b 492 (87) 112 (82) 222 (74)
 T2b 37 (7) 17 (13) 50 (17)
 >T2b 39 (7) 7 (5) 27 (9)
Positive biopsy cores (%) 0.33 0.36 0.44 0.037
PSA 8.28 10.51 11.74 0.001
Pathological Gleason score (%) <0.001
 <7 309 (54) 56 (42) 108 (37)
 7 231 (40) 66 (49) 133 (45)
 >7 36 (6) 12 (9) 54 (18)
PSM 217 (38) 53 (40) 124 (43) 0.40
Capsular penetration (%) 135 (20) 67 (39) 28 (61) <0.001
Seminal vesicle involvement (%) 38 (7) 10 (8) 43 (15) <0.001
Positive lymph nodes (%) 6 (1) 3 (3) 8 (3) 0.25
Apical PSM 77 (19) 12 (18) 27 (10) 0.40
Bladder neck PSM 17 (3) 3 (2) 20 (7) 0.007
Recurrence 128 (22) 33 (25) 119 (40) <0.001

Abbreviations: BNS, bilateral nerve sparing; NNS, non-NS; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; PSM, positive surgical margin; UNS, unilateral nerve sparing.

*

P-value by chi-square test except where noted.

P-value by analysis of variance.

a

BNS and UNS groups combined to compare age to NNS groups.