Table 3. Comparison of the phenotypic variables between strains isolated from the wine commercial and vineyard strain groups.
Phenotypic variable | Wine commercial | Vineyard | ||
Mean | S.D. | Mean | S.D. | |
Cell number, 106 c/mL | 119 | 27 | 92 | 22 |
Dry weight, g/L | 3.6 | 0.5 | 3.8 | 0.9 |
Vmax, g/L/h | 1.7 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 0.3 |
CO2produced g/L | 112 | 3 | 108 | 8 |
T75 hr | 88 | 10 | 109 | 27 |
T50 hr | 61 | 5 | 67 | 16 |
V50 g/L·h | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
Succinate g/L | 0.62 | 0.14 | 0.63 | 0.29 |
Glycerol g/L | 7.0 | 0.4 | 7.1 | 0.7 |
Acetate g/L | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
Isobutanol g/L | 52 | 7.8 | 70 | 48 |
Isobutyl acetate g/L | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.06 |
Isoamyl alcohol g/L | 242 | 64 | 194 | 87 |
Isoamyl acetate g/L | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.7 |
Ethyl acetate g/L | 24 | 3 | 23 | 3 |
Ethyl butyrate g/L | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.04 |
Ethyl hexanoate g/L | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
Ethyl octanoate g/L | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 |