Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Pharmacol. 2011 Oct;22(7):718–722. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e32834aff84

Table 1.

Maximum percent drug-appropriate responding (DAR) of each test compound and effects on rate of responding at that dose.

Training
Drug
Test Compound Dose
(mg/kg)
N
Tes
%DAR Rate
resp/s
Propofol Vehicle 0 8/8 15.2±12.3 0.882±0.115
Propofol Propofol 1 8/8 35.6±17.4 1.03±0.070
Propofol Propofol 2.5 8/8 35.3±17.1 1.122±0.129
Propofol Propofol 5 8/8 46.6±16.4 1.225±0.126
Propofol Propofol 10 7/7 90.7±8.3 0.992±0.067
Propofol Chlordiazepoxide 10 5/5 64.8±21.4* 1.296±0.224
Propofol Carisoprodol 100 5/5 59.5±24.3* 1.210±0.210
Propofol Dizocilpine 0.1 5/5 34.1±17.0 0.376±0.216
Propofol Propofol + Pentylenetetrazol 10 5/5 32.2±20.4 0.941±0.273

Carisoprodol Vehicle 0 6/6 1.2±0.8 1.171±0.192
Carisoprodol Carisoprodol 100 6/6 99.2±0.8 1.139±0.279
Carisoprodol Propofol 10 4/6 51.6±27.6* 0.617±0.225

N Test = number of rats which completed the first fixed ratio / total number tested. resp/s = responses per second.

*

shows values that reached the criteria for partial substitution (≥40% and <80% drug-appropriate responding and not statistically different from the training drug).

shows response rates different from vehicle control.