Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 17;36(8):747–760. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjr043

Table 2.

Peak activations during attention to odor

Region x, y, z coordinates MNI
Cluster size in voxels Z value Z valuea PFDR
DETECT O− minus PASSIVE O−
    Right (para)hippocampal gyrus/substantia nigra/mediodorsal thalamusab 15 −21 −18 529 4.55 4.55 0.038c
6 −18 12 4.54 4.54
−9 −12 −12 4.41 4.41
    Cerebelluma 6 −69 −39 259 4.38 4.38 0.038c
0 −51 −33 3.98 3.81
−12 −69 −42 3.79 3.79
    Right ventral insula/caudal OFCab 45 0 −15 53 3.89 3.89 0.030d
36 12 −21 3.31 3.31
48 9 −18 3.19 3.19
    Right anterior insula/frontal operculuma 36 21 0 31 3.60 3.60 0.023d
36 15 −6 3.30 3.20
    Left ventral insula/caudal OFCa −42 −9 −15 57 3.58 3.58 0.020d
−45 −18 0 3.47 3.47
−42 0 −18 3.25
    Left piriform/caudal OFCab −24 0 −21 42 3.26 3.26 0.015d
    Left anterior insulaa −39 18 6 11 2.91 2.67 e

Bold font indicates the maximally activated voxel in the cluster. Italics indicate that a peak falls under the same cluster as the preceding peak; T-map thresholded at Puncorrected = 0.005.

a

Cluster is also significant if masked exclusively by DETECT T minus PASSIVE T(attention to taste).

b

Cluster is also significant if masked inclusively by PASSIVE O+ minus PASSIVE O(sensory olfactory stimulation).

c

Significant at PFDRcorrected = 0.05 across the whole brain.

d

Significant at PFDRcorrected = 0.05 across the region of interest.

e

Not significant corrected for multiple comparisons, but we chose to report this peak because it contributes to the peak in the conjuction analysis.