Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 6;11:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-127

Table 3.

Weighted logistic regression output for no change versus change in cognitive group

Weighted Logistic Regression Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals
Tomabugh and McIntyre Folstein et al. MRC CFAS
Age group 65-69 1.0 (referrant) - -
70-74 1.37 (1.01, 1.85) * 1.16 (0.87, 1.54) 1.17 (0.89, 1.53)
75-79 1.81 (1.32, 2.49) 1.22 (0.89, 1.67) 1.30 (0.96, 1.74)
80-84 1.55 (1.08, 2.23) * 1.34 (0.96, 1.86) 1.21 (0.88, 1.67)
85-89 1.72 (1.11, 2.67) * 1.12 (0.74, 1.69) 1.12 (0.76, 1.65)
≥ 90 0.85 (0.41, 1.72) 0.97 (0.53, 1.77) 0.56 (0.31, 1.02)
Sex Men 1.01 (0.81, 1.26) 0.91 (0.74, 1.13) 0.93 (0.76, 1.13)
Centre Cambridge 1.0 (referrant) - -
Gwynedd 1.08 (0.77, 1.51) 1.30 (0.94, 1.79) 1.28 (0.94, 1.75)
Newcastle 0.75 (0.53, 1.06) 0.91 (0.65, 1.28) 0.96 (0.70, 1.32)
Nottingham 1.16 (0.82, 1.64) 1.43 (1.01, 2.00) * 1.39 (1.01, 1.93) *
Oxford 0.89 (0.63, 1.27) 1.08 (0.76, 1.52) 1.10 (0.79, 1.54)
Screen MMSE score 0.86 (0.84, 0.88) 0.99 (0.97, 1.02) 0.95 (0.93, 0.97)
Months between screen
and assessment
1.05 (0.99, 1.11) 1.00 (0.95, 1.05) 1.00 (0.95, 1.05)

*P < 0.05, P < 0.001