Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 7;3:896–908. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr080

Table 2.

Genome-Wide Model Family Ranking

Data/Count Rank
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
AIC best model Mammal TIM3 TrN TPM3uf GTR HKY TIM2 TIM1 TPM2uf TVM TPM1uf
10 15.09 12.69 10.39 9.08 9.03 8.37 7.43 4.14 2.81 2.63
Vertebrate GTR TIM2 TIM3 TrN TIM1 TVM TPM3uf
7 28.29 20.73 12.96 7.61 4.26 3.53 3.01
Drosophila TIM2 GTR TIM3 TrN TIM1 TVM
6 28.84 23.2 12.83 9.17 4.98 2.1
AIC 95% CI Mammal TIM3 GTR TrN TIM2 TIM1 TPM3uf HKY TVM TPM2uf TPM1uf
59.34 52.69 51.02 49.43 47.84 41.81 36.01 35.27 34.86 33.48
Vertebrate GTR TIM2 TIM3 TIM1 TrN TVM TPM3uf TPM2uf HKY TPM1uf
32.98 24.7 21.31 15.81 15.37 13.5 10.07 9.95 6.43 5.92
Drosophila GTR TIM2 TIM3 TrN TIM1 TVM TPM2uf TPM3uf HKY SYM
34.95 30.39 24.29 19.68 18.04 11.26 9.89 8.59 6.49 6.31
AIC best model LP mammal Low LP TrN HKY TIM3 TIM1 TPM3uf TPM1uf TIM2 TPM2uf TrNef TIM2ef
12 22.44 14.82 9.56 7.48 5.54 5.12 5.12 4.02 2.35 1.39
Mid LP TIM3 TrN TPM3uf TIM2 HKY GTR TPM2uf TPM1uf TIM1 TVM
10 17.31 14.13 11.08 9.83 9.14 7.34 4.02 3.46 3.19 2.77
High LP GTR TVM TIM3 TPM3uf TPM2uf TIM2 TrN
7 25.09 15.7 14.98 12.27 5.05 4.15 3.79

Note.—The set of model families with 1) the highest representation under the best model, 2) the 95% CI, or 3) the best model for different subsets of the mammal set varying in both alignment length and pairwise nucleotide diversity (“Best Model LP Mammal”) are shown ranked by their frequency (as a percentage) in each of the three sets of species (labels under the “Data” column, first and second main rows) or low, median, and high values of LP (labels under the “Data” column, third main row). Only the first ten ranks shown, and where the best model is considered (first and third main rows), only the minimum number of families required to explain at least 80% of all genes were considered (numbers under the “Count” column).