Table 5.
Author and year | Title of study | Study design | Number of patients and level of evidence | Type of intervention | Outcome | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Price et al. 1998 [45] | Traumatic vertebral arterial dissection and vertebrobasilar arterial thrombosis successfully treated with endovascular thrombolysis and stenting | Case report | 1 | Endovascular thrombolysis and stenting followed by oral anticoagulation with warfarin | No neurological deficits, patient returned to employment | 3 months |
Lee et al. 2007 [23] |
Therapeutic endovascular treatments for traumatic vertebral Artery injuries |
Retrospective analysis | 6 | 3 stented, 1 coil embolisation, 2 had stent-assisted coil embolisation | 3 improved neurologically, 3 stayed stable with no new neurological deficits | Follow-up 16-55 months |
Wang and Orbach 2008 [17] | Traumatic dissecting aneurysm at the vertebrobasilar junction in a 3-month-old infant: evaluation and treatment strategies. | Case report | 1 | Coil embolisation | Full neurological recovery | 3 months |
Stein et al. 2009 [24] | Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: does treatment always matter? | Two part study—retrospective analysis then prospective follow-up | 6 | Coil embolisation. 4 patients had anticoagulation afterwards. | Unspecified | Endovascular technique used in high-grade TVAI and where medical therapy was unsuitable |