Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 17;11:651. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-651

Table 5.

Association of concurrency in past 12 months with HIV seroprevalence, unadjusted and after adjusting for confounders1

Odds ratio
(95% CI)
p-value
OUTCOME = HIV SEROPREVALENCE
EXPOSURE = ANY CONCURRENCY IN PAST 12 MONTHS
Among men reporting sex in past 12 months (N = 1655)
Model 1
 Any concurrency in the past 12 months 1.33 (0.85-2.08) P = 0.22
Model 2
 Any concurrency in the past 12 months 1.13 (0.67-1.89) P = 0.64
 Adjusted for: age group, marital status and lifetime partners2
Model 3
 Any concurrency in the past 12 months 1.04 (0.62-1.77) P = 0.88
 Adjusted for: age group, marital status, lifetime partners2 and casual partner in past 12 months

OUTCOME = HIV SEROPREVALENCE
EXPOSURE = CONCURRENCY WITH POLYGYNOUS PARTNERS ONLY
Among men reporting sex in past 12 months (N = 1655)
Model 1
 Concurrency with polygynous partner in past 12 months 0.50 (0.18-1.39) P = 0.14
Model 2
 Concurrency with polygynous partner in past 12 months 0.40 (0.14-1.11) P = 0.07
 Adjusted for lifetime partners2 in past 12 months

OUTCOME = HIV SEROPREVALENCE
EXPOSURE = CONCURRENCY EXCLUDING POLYGYNY
Among men reporting sex in past 12 months (N = 1655)
Model 1
 Concurrency with non-spousal partner in past 12 months 1.78 (1.11-2.86) P = 0.02
Model 2
 Concurrency with non-spousal partner in past 12 months 1.36 (0.82-2.25) P = 0.25
 Adjusted for lifetime partners2 and casual partner in past 12 months

OUTCOME = HIV SEROPREVALENCE IN SPOUSE
EXPOSURE = ANY CONCURRENCY IN PAST 12 MONTHS
Among wives of men reporting sex in past 12 months (N = 1134)
Model 1
 Any concurrency by husband in the past 12 months 1.17 (0.71-1.92) 0.54
Model 23
 Any concurrency by husband in the past 12 months 0.97 (0.59-1.59) 0.90
 Adjusted for husband's lifetime partners2

1The following potential confounders were considered: age, SES, marital status, age at first sex, lifetime partners, casual partner in past year and condom use at last sex. Those variables which changed the OR for the association with concurrency by > 10% were retained.

2Lifetime partners above the median for males in the cohort (see Table 1)

3Adjusted model considered all potential confounders listed in footnote 1, and reported behaviour of wife (lifetime partners, casual partner in past year, and condom use at last sex).