Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 20;3:13. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2011.00013

Table 3.

Mean ± SE of neuropsychological tests for the groups of participants (CD: contemporary dance, N = 16; fall: fall prevention, N = 67; Tai: Tai Chi Chuan, N = 27).

CD Fall Tai CD vs. fall CD vs. tai
F P F P
AWP low accuracy (/1)
Pre-test 0.87 ± 0.09 0.82 ± 0.04 0.89 ± 0.07 1.10 0.296 1.72 0.197
Post-test 0.69 ± 0.10 0.78 ± 0.05 0.88 ± 0.08
AWP high accuracy (/1)
Pre-test 0.37 ± 0.12 0.39 ± 0.06 0.26 ± 0.09 <1 1.12 0.296
Post-test 0.31 ± 0.12 0.45 ± 0.06 0.41 ± 0.10
Stroop interference ratio (/1)
Pre-test 0.46 ± 0.03 0.50 ± 0.01 0.52 ± 0.02 1.35 0.248 1.42 0.240
Post-test 0.48 ± 0.03 0.49 ± 0.01 0.51 ± 0.02
Stroop interference rate (%)
Pre-test 3.29 ± 1.79 2.10 ± 0.88 2.34 ± 1.38 1.18 0.280 <1
Post-test 6.65 ± 2.57 1.98 ± 1.25 2.41 ± 1.98
Rule shift score (/4)
Pre-test 2.19 ± 0.28 3.03 ± 0.13 3.15 ± 0.21 3.82 0.054 1.46 0.234
Post-test 2.69 ± 0.29* 2.97 ± 0.14 3.26 ± 0.22
Rule shift switch ER (%)
Pre-test 43.7 ± 7.50 19.4 ± 3.67 16.0 ± 5.77 4.25 0.042 3.35 0.074
Post-test 27.1 ± 8.01* 21.2 ± 3.91 15.6 ± 6.17

ANOVAs’ F and P values for the interaction between Group (CD vs. fall or CD vs. Tai) and Period (pre- vs. post-test). Asterisks indicate statistical significant difference (NK, P < 0.05) between pre- and post-test periods. AWP low/high: arithmetic word problems with low/high planning demand.