Table 3.
Estimated odds ratio (95% CI) under ordinal regression models predicting ovariancancer stage at diagnosis
| OR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model I | Model II | Model III | |
| Stage at diagnosis | |||
| Stage I (ref) | - | - | - |
| Stage II | 2.8 (0.6, 12.4) | 0.5 (0.02, 10.9) | 2.4 (0.1, 80.1) |
| Stage III | 3.9 (0.9, 17.5) | 0.7 (0.03, 15.7) | 3.5 (0.1, 116.4) |
| Stage IV | 53.3 (11.1, 255.5)** | 10.0 (0.4, 230.4) | 48.7 (1.4, 1689.7)* |
|
| |||
| Age at diagnosis | 1.03 (1.01, 1.05)** | 1.03 (1.01, 1.06)* | 1.03 (1.01, 1.06)* |
|
| |||
| Black women | 1.1 (0.6, 2.0) | 1.0 (0.6, 1.9) | 1.2 (0.6, 2.7) |
|
| |||
| Years of education | 1.0 (0.9, 1.0) | 1.0 (0.9, 1.0) | 1.0 (0.9, 1.0) |
|
| |||
| Currently married | 1.5 (1.0, 2.3) | 1.4 (0.9, 2.2) | 1.3 (0.8, 2.1) |
|
| |||
| Familial cancer | 0.7 (0.5, 1.2) | 0.7 (0.5, 1.2) | |
|
| |||
| Age at menarche | 0.9 (0.8, 1.0) | 0.9 (0.8, 1.1) | |
| LOP | |||
| Low (ref) | - | - | |
| Medium | 1.3 (0.7, 2.3) | 1.2 (0.7, 2.1) | |
| High | 0.9 (0.4, 1.7) | 0.8 (0.4, 1.6) | |
|
| |||
| Parity | |||
| Nulliparous (ref) | - | - | |
| 1 child | 1.2 (0.6, 2.5) | 1.4 (0.7, 2.8) | |
| 2 children | 1.1 (0.6, 2.3) | 1.3 (0.6, 2.5) | |
| 3 or more children | 1.0 (0.5, 2.0) | 1.0 (0.5, 2.1) | |
|
| |||
| Smoking history | 1.0 (0.6, 1.6) | 1.0 (0.7, 1.6) | |
|
| |||
| Oral contraceptive use | 1.2 (0.7, 2.0) | 1.2 (0.7, 2.2) | |
|
| |||
| Hormone use, >=5yrs | 0.6 (0.3, 1.2) | 0.6 (0.3, 1.3) | |
|
| |||
| Genital powder use | 1.5 (0.8, 2.7) | 1.5 (0.8, 2.9) | |
|
| |||
| Tubal ligation | 0.9 (0.5, 1.8) | 0.9 (0.4, 1.7) | |
|
| |||
| Hysterectomy | 1.8 (0.8, 4.0) | 1.9 (0.9, 4.3) | |
|
| |||
| Recommended food score | 1.0 (0.9, 1.0) | 1.0 (0.9, 1.0) | |
|
| |||
| % Census level poverty | 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) | ||
|
| |||
| % Medicaid patients | 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) | ||
|
| |||
| Annual number of patients | 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) | ||
*
p<.05
**
p<.01
Note: Model I and II are reduced models and Model III is the full model.