Table 5.
Disorganized Schizotypal Symptoms in Relatives of Schizophrenia Probands versus Non-Psychiatric Controls
| Study | Relatives of Schizophrenia Probands | Schizotypy Assessment | Comparison with Psychiatrically Healthy Controlsb | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relationship to Proband (n) |
Sex % m |
Age mean yrs |
Psychiatric Status |
Measure | Factor Symptom |
screening criteria (n) |
match to schiz rels |
effect size |
|
|
Kendler et. al, 1995 (Roscommon Family Study) |
1st degree relatives (314) |
n/a | n/a | no schiz or schizoaff |
SIS | Odd Speech Factor Cognitive slippage Odd speech |
1st degree rels of unscreened control probands; no schiz or schizoaff (575) |
n/a | d3 = 0.96** |
| Kremen et. al, 1998 | 1st degree relatives (40) |
22.5% | m: 40.8 f: 42.9 |
no psychosis or substance abuse |
SPQ | Disorganized Factor | ≤ 70 on the MMPI-168 (44) |
age, sex, race |
d5 = 0.22 |
| Yaralian et. al, 2000 | relatives (13) | 92.3% | 29.9 | unscreened | SPQ | Disorganized Factor Odd behaviors Odd speech |
no family history of schiz-spectrum or alcohol/drug abuse (51) |
age, sex, race |
d2 = 0.49 n.s. n.s. |
| Appels et. al, 2004 | parents (36 couples) |
50.0% | median: 54.9 |
no psychosis or substance abuse |
SPQ | Disorganized Factor Odd Behaviors Odd Speech |
no psychotic, affective, substance, or personality d/o (26 couples) |
age, sex, handedness, education, IQ |
n.s. |
| Calkins et. al, 2004 | parents, sibs, offspring (124) |
49.2% | 46.5 | no psychosis | SPQ | Disorganized Factor Odd Behaviors Odd Speech |
no diagnosis (109) | sex |
d1 = 0.17 d1 = 0.11 d1 = 0.17 |
| Compton et. al, 2009 | parents, sibs, offspring (28) |
17.9% | n/a | No psychosis or mood d/o |
SPQ | Cognitive-Perceptual Factor | No mood or psychotic d/o, self or 1st or 2nd degree rels (32) |
n/a | n.s. |
| Mean Effect Size f or Factor-Level C ompariso ns6 | d = 0.73 | ||||||||
Note: SIS - Structured Interview for Schizotypy, SPQ - Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (self-report), MMPI - Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, unscreened - psychiatric diagnoses not excluded, no diagnosis - all psychiatric diagnoses excluded, schiz - schizophrenia, schizoaff - schizoaffective disorder, SPD - Schizotypal personality disorder, m - male, f – female, rels – relatives, n/a - not reported/not able to calculate, empty cell: not reported by original study, bold font denotes effect size for factor-level comparisons.
Torgersen et al, 1993 also reported results for MZ and DZ twins - all comparisons were not significant.
Unless otherwise noted, healthy control groups are comprised of individual control probands
Glass' d (relative M - control M / control SD)
Glass' d calculated by current author
Cohen's d (relative M - control M / pooled SD) transformed from odds ratio: d = lno(√3/π) (Hasselblad & Hedges, 1995)
Cohen's d transformed from t: d = t(n1+n2)/√df(√n1n2); [pooled, equal variances assumed] (Rosenthal, 1994)
Cohen's d transformed from chi square: rφ = √X2/n; d = 2r/√1-r² (Johnson and Eagly, 2000)
Mean effect sizes were calculated for factor comparisons using the overall effect size for each study (indicated in bold) by weighting each ‘d’ by the inverse of the conditional variance of ‘d’ (Shadish & Haddock, 1994)
p < .001
p < .01
p < .05
p < .10