Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jul 18;34(4):880–886. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22670

Table 3.

Influence of processing options on shear velocity measurements.

Frequency Method Component
45 Hz APxRL RLxHF HFxAP

Curl + DF 2.3 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 0.3 2.3 ± 0.2
No DF 2.7 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0.5 2.3 ± 0.2

HF (phase) AP (freq) RL (slice)

No Curl 2.6 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.3 2.5 ± 0.4

76 Hz APxRL RLxHF HFxAP

Curl + DF 3.2 ± 0.4 3.1 ± 0.3 3 ± 0.3
No DF 4 ± 0.5 3.8 ± 0.6 3.2 ± 0.2

HF (phase) AP (freq) RL (slice)

No Curl 3.4 ± 0.3 4.3 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.4

Velocities are reported as mean ± standard deviation, in m/s. The method we chose (Curl + DF) provided consistent measurements for all components. Disabling the directional filter (No DF) had no significant influence of the velocities measured from the HFxAP component. Disabling the curl operator (No Curl) resulted in increased velocity measurements, especially for displacement in the AP direction.