Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med Sci. 2011 Dec;342(6):467–473. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3182199214

Table 5.

Pair-wise comparison of various maintenance treatment groups for treatment outcomes in proliferative lupus nephritis. Mycophenolate sodium (MPS), when compared to the others [a group comprising cyclophosphamide and miscellaneous immunosuppressive agents excluding mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)] as a maintenance agent showed a significantly better complete and partial remission rates in proliferative lupus nephritis.

Outcome variable Maintenance treatment group p
No Relapse vs. Relapse MPS vs. Others 0.7246
Alive and not on dialysis vs. ESRD or Death MPS vs. Others 0.0777
CR or PR vs. Non-responders MPS vs. Others 0.0258*
No Relapse vs. Relapse MPS vs. MMF 0.2718
Alive and not on dialysis vs. ESRD or Death MPS vs. MMF 0.6358
CR or PR vs. Non-responders MPS vs. MMF 0.4089
No Relapse vs. Relapse MMF vs. others 1.0
Alive and not on dialysis vs. ESRD or Death MMF vs. others 0.2759
CR or PR vs. Non-responders MMF vs. others 0.285

CR; complete remission, PR: partial remission,

*

indicates statistically significant result.