Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jul 18;34(4):764–773. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22662

Table 3. Significant Differences in HFC Network Connectivity between the Mild AD Group at Baseline and the CN Group.

Brain Region Side BA Cluster Size (mm3) Talairach Coordinates (LPI) z-Score

x y z
Decreased connectivity in the positive HFC network
MOG L 28816 -33 -73 8.0 -3.93
Fusiform gyrus L -24 -55 -10 -2.88
PCC L 30 -4 -67 10 -3.14
Lingual gyrus L 18 -6 -69 5 -2.81
Lingual gyrus R 18 6 -75 2 -2.73
Cuneus L 30 -4 -67 9 -3.14
Cuneus R 18 14 -81 27 -3.25
SPC L 7 6032 -7 -65 58 -2.93
Precuneus R 7 5 -52 52 -2.87
Postcentral gyrus R 4 10 -39 63 -2.68
Decreased connectivity in the negative (anticorrelation) HFC network
DLPFC R 9 8776 27 39 36 -3.76
IFG R 13 41 23 11 -2.90
ACC R 32 11 24 36 -2.56

The results were obtained with two sample t test, p < 0.05, cluster size > 4048 mm3, the whole brain corrected.

BA = Brodmann's area; LPI = left, posterior, and inferior; R = right; L = left; x, y, z = coordinates of peak locations in the Talairach space; HFC = hippocampal functional connectivity; MOG = middle occipital gyrus; PCC = posterior cingulate cortex; SPC = superior parietal cortex; DLPFC = dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; IFG = inferior frontal gyrus; ACC = anterior cingulate cortex.