Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 21;101(6):1440–1449. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.07.048

Table 1.

Summary of major direct protein-GMP/GDP substrate interactions

OGMP
CGMP
CGMP, ATP
CGDP,ADP
Protein residue Domain GMP/GDP (GMP binding) (Closure) (ATP binding) (P transfer)
Strong interactions
Glu88 (OE1,2) GMP-BD GMP/GDP (N1,2) >100% >100% >100% >100%
Arg57 (NE, NH1) GMP-BD GMP/GDP (Pα,β) >100% 46% >100% >100%
Ser53 (OG) GMP-BD GMP/GDP (O6, N7) 87% 66% 95% 96%
Tyr69 (OH) GMP-BD GMP/GDP (Pα) 97% >100% >100% 48%
Arg166 (NH1,2) LID GMP/GDP (Pα) >100% >100%
LID GDP (Pβ) >100%
Arg155 (NH1,2) LID GDP (Pβ) >100%
Ser30 (OG) CORE GDP (Pβ) 100%
Weaker interactions
Arg60 (NH1,2) GMP-BD GMP/GDP (Pα) 60% >100% 28% >100%
Thr101 (OG1) GMP-BD GMP/GDP (O6) <5% 71% <5% <5%
Asp121 (OD2) CORE GMP/GDP (N2) 57% 15% 40%
Lys34 (NZ) CORE GMP/GDP (O3′,Pα) 53% 43%
CORE GDP (Pβ) 86%

Hydrogen-bonding and salt-bridge contact frequency in the catalytic site during the MD simulations of enzymatic substates 2–5 (see Fig. 2). Contacts are sorted from the strongest to the weakest interaction. Atoms or groups involved in the interaction are indicated in parentheses. Frequencies over 70% are shown in boldface. Percentages over 100% take into account multiple interactions from different groups of the same residue (such as bidentate contacts).