Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 5.
Published in final edited form as: Nutr Res. 2011 Aug 5;31(8):594–600. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2011.07.004

Table 1.

Frequencies and percentages for participant characteristics by reporting status

Characteristic Plausible (n=347) Nonplausiblea (n=318) Total (n=665)
Taster Status n(%) n(%) n(%)
 Non-taster 96(27.7) 96(30.2) 192(28.9)
 Taster 137(39.5) 110(34.6) 247(37.1)
 Super Taster 114(32.9) 112(35.2) 226(34.0)
Genderb
 Female 199(57.3) 152(47.8) 351(52.8)
 Male 148(42.7) 166(52.2) 314(47.2)
Age
 9 125(36.0) 97(30.5) 222(33.4)
 10 64(18.4) 56(17.6) 120(18.0)
 17 122(35.2) 121(38.1) 243(36.5)
 18 36(10.4) 44(13.8) 80(12.0)
Race/Ethnicity
 White 95(27.4) 93(29.2) 188(28.3)
 African American 106(30.5) 99(31.1) 205(30.8)
 Hispanic 97(28.0) 93(29.2) 190(28.6)
 Other 49(14.1) 33(10.4) 82(12.3)
Obesity
 Underweight 118(34.0) 118(37.1) 236(35.5)
 Healthy weight 86(24.8) 82(25.8) 168(25.3)
 Overweight 143(41.2) 118(37.1) 261(39.2)
 Obese
Annual Household Income 8(2.3) 4(1.3) 12(1.8)
 <$30,000 218(62.8) 159(50.0) 377(56.7)
 $30,000–$59,000 74(21.3) 58(18.2) 132(19.8)
 >$60,000 47(13.5) 97(30.5) 144(21.7)
a

Nonplausile reports include 250 under-reporters and 68 over-reporters

b

Significant association between gender and reporting status (X2=6.07, df=1, p=0.014)