Table 1:
Name | Statistical approach | Biases explicitly corrected | Training data required | Quality score | Practical notes | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bustard | Parametric Model | Σ, ϕ, δ | No | Phred | Not freely retrievable | |
Alta-Cyclic | Mixed Parametric and SVM | Σ, ϕ, δ | Yes | Phred | No longer maintained; requires a Sun Grid Engine cluster environment | [16] |
Rolexa | Parametric Model | Σ, ϕ, ω | No | IUPAC | No longer maintained | [17] |
Swift | Parametric Model | Σ, ϕ, µ | No | Phred | No longer maintained | [15] |
BayesCall/ naiveBayesCall | Parametric Model | Σ, ϕ, δ | No | Phred | [19, 22] | |
Seraphim | Parametric Model | Σ, ϕ, δ | No | Phred | We did not succeed installing it | [21] |
Ibis | Fully empirical SVM | (n/a) | Yes | Phred | [18] | |
BING | Parametric Model | Σ, ϕ | No | None | Not freely retrievable; requires own image processing as input | [23] |
We give a short description of the statistical approach used by each application. Next, the biases explicitly modeled and corrected by the application are reported (see Figure 1 for details). Alta-cyclic and Ibis rely on supervised learning and require training data. Finally uncertainty measurements or sequencing quality is either reported as Phred scores or using IUPAC codes. For details, please refer to the main text.