Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteomics. 2011 Apr 23;74(7):1002–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.04.013

Table 2.

Results of CPH model to determine individual proteins in the training set associated with survival (A) and recurrence (B). “Poor” effect denotes a worse patient prognosis as the protein intensity increases, and likewise, “favorable” denotes a better prognosis as the protein intensity increases.

m/z Protein Effect P value
A) Test set: survival markers
4049 Poor 0.021
4737 * TYB-10 * Poor 0.023
4748 * TYB-4 * Poor 0.015
7045 Poor 0.013
11,307 Histone H4 Favorable 0.03
13,778 Histone H2B Favorable 0.018
B) Test set: recurrence markers
4283 Favorable 0.006
12,275 Cytochrome C Favorable 0.01
16,789 Calmodulin Favorable 0.056
*

Indicates protein form observed has a C-terminal truncation.