Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 7;25(3):269–277. doi: 10.1038/eye.2010.202

Table 1. Mean rates of change for patients with progressive glaucoma as measured by CLSO, SLP (GDxVCC and GDxECC), and Stratus OCT.

Imaging technology Study Parameter Mean rates of change
AROC
      Progressors Non-progressors  
CSLO Alencar et al1 RA average (mm2/year) −0.0058 −0.0073 0.51 (95% CI, 0.40–0.61)
  Poli et al2a RA average (mm2/year) −0.0123 NA NA
  See et al3 RA average (mm2/year) −0.0053 −0.0012 NA
GDxECC Medeiros et al4 TSNIT average (μm/year) −0.95 −0.17 NA
  Medeiros et al5 TSNIT average (μm/year) −1.24 −0.34 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83–0.95)
  Grewal et al6b TSNIT average (μm/year) −1.11 −0.41 NA
GDxVCC Medeiros et al7c TSNIT average (μm/year) −0.70 −0.14 NA
  Medeiros et al5d TSNIT average (μm/year) −0.46 −0.15 0.65 (95% CI, 0.53–0.77)
  Alencar et al1 TSNIT average (μm/year) −0.65 −0.11 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74–0.88)
Stratus OCT Medeiros et al8 TSNIT average (μm/year) −0.72 −0.14 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72–0.92)
  Leung et al9 TSINT average (μm/year) −3.30 (median) NA NA

Abbreviations: AROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; ARP, atypical patterns of retardation; CI, confidence interval; CLSO, confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy; ECC, enhanced corneal compensation; NA, not applicable; OCT, optical coherence tomography; RA, rim area; SAP, standard automated perimetry; SLP, scanning laser polarimetry; TSNIT, temporal–superior–nasal–inferior–temporal.

a

Calculated for ‘converters' (defined as normal or ocular hypertensive subjects who progressed to glaucoma).

b

Progression was defined by the slope of the visual field index on SAP.

c

Included scans with ARP.

d

Excluded scans with ARP.