Table 1. Results of likelihood analyses testing Hypotheses 1 and 2.

Experiment 1
	Hypothesis 1			Hypothesis 2
Participant	a1	LL	AIC	a2	b	LL	AIC
1	106	−3.05	8.11	114	7000	−3	9.99
2	168	−3.12	8.25	200	6400	−3.05	10.1
3	152	−3.13	8.26	188	3600	−3.1	10.2
4	100	−3.18	8.36	140	3000	−3.16	10.31
5	22	−3.14	8.28	72	12000	−2.99	9.98
6	26	−3.14	8.27	66	8800	−3.03	10.06
7	18	−3.18	8.36	60	9400	−3.05	10.11
8	22	−3.08	8.16	66	13800	−2.88	9.76
9	18	−3.13	8.27	44	7200	−3.07	10.14

Likelihood analyses testing Hypotheses 1 and 2 for Experiments 1 and 2 (LL refers to the log-likelihood estimate). These analyses compared the 2D frequency distribution of each individual on a 5x5 matrix with the expected result E(R) from Hypotheses 1 and 2 on the same matrix (see details in the text). The participants are numbered according to their mean release angle in Experiment 1 and mean release velocity in Experiment 2 to facilitate visual comparison with their data shown in Figures 4B and 5B, respectively.