Table 1. Epidemiological Studies on Selenium and Prostate Cancera.
—ordered by study design and publication year
| 1st Author, pub. Year, reference | Country | Cases/Controls | Results (RR comparing highest to lowest quantile) | Selenium assessment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All cancer | Advanced cancer | |||||||||
| OR | 95%CI | p-trend | OR | 95%CI | p-trend | Specimen | Mean/medianb | |||
| Randomized Clinical Trial | ||||||||||
| Clark 1996[3] | United States | 13/35c | 0.37 | 0.18–0.71 | 0.002 | Plasma (at baseline) | 114 | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| Nested Case-Control, Case-Cohort Studies or Cohort | ||||||||||
| Peters 2008 | United States | 830/34412 | 0.90 | 0.62–0.13 | 0.97 | 0.46 | 0.17–1.3 | 0.31 | Supplement | 26.6 μg in users |
|
| ||||||||||
| Peters 2007[27] | United States | 724/879 | 0.84 | 0.62–1.14 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.30–1.29 | 0.57 | Serum | 141 |
| Li 2004[19] | United States | 586/577 | 0.78 | 0.54–1.13 | 0.16 | 0.52 | 0.28–0.98 | 0.05 | Plasma | 108 |
| van den Brandt 2003[20] | Netherlands | 540/1211 | 0.69 | 0.48–0.99 | 0.008 | 0.62 | 0.37–1.05 | 0.02 | Toenails | 0.55 |
| Brooks 2001[24] | United States | 52/996 | 0.24 | 0.08–0.77 | 0.01 | Serum | 120 | |||
| Goodman 2001[25] | United States | 235/456 | 1.02 | 0.65–1.60 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.34–1.71 | 0.35 | Serum | 114 |
| Nomura 2000[21] | United States | 249/249 | 0.5 | 0.3–0.9 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.1–0.8 | 0.01 | Serum | 132 |
| Helzlsouer 2000[22] | United States | 117/233 | 0.38 | 0.17–0.85 | 0.12 | Toenails | 0.79 | |||
| Yoshizawa 1998[23] | United States | 181/181 | 0.35 | 0.16–0.78 | 0.03 | Toenails | 0.96 | |||
| Criqui 1991[43] | North America | 6/12 | Selenium levels lower in prostate cancer cases than controls by 20 ng/ml (p<0.1) | Plasma | 149 | |||||
| Knekt 1990[26] | Finland | 51/102 | 1.15 | Not reported | 0.71 | Serum | 58 | |||
| Coates 1988[51] | United States | 13/22 | 0.3 | Not reported | 0.18 | Serum Plasma |
162 148 |
|||
| Peleg 1985[50] | United States | 14/28 | Selenium levels not-significant higher in prostate cancer cases (0.120 μg/ml) than controls (0.117 μg/ml) | Serum | 117 | |||||
| Willett 1983[49] | United States | 11/22 | Selenium levels lower in prostate cancer cases (0.128 μg/ml) than controls (0.139 μg/ml) (p=0.12) | Serum | 139 | |||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Population-based Case-Control Studies | ||||||||||
| Allen 2004[16] | United Kingdom | 300/300 | 1.24 | 0.73–2.10 | 0.58 | 0.78 | 0.27–2.25 | 0.48 | Nails | 0.61 |
| Vogt 2003[17] | United States | 212/233 | 0.71 | 0.39–1.28 | 0.11 | 0.75 | 0.32–1.80 | 0.49 | Serum | 137 |
| Ghadirian 2000[18] | Canada | 83/82 | 1.14 | 0.46–2.83 | 0.62 | Toenails | 0.91 | |||
Ecologic studies and observational studies using dietary questionnaire data to assess selenium intake or patients with benign hyperplasia as controls were excluded
Mean/median selenium levels in controls only, serum and plasma selenium levels in ng/ml and toenail selenium levels in ng/mg
Number of prostate cancer cases in selenium supplementation group/placebo group