Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2011 May 20;49(4):379–385. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.01.013

Table 2.

Adjusted main effects respondent-level building model predicting standardized depressive symptom score

Male (n=510) Female (574)
b p 95% CI b p 95% CI

Genotype
 SS 0.04 0.72 −0.17 0.24 0.05 0.67 −0.19 0.29
 SL −0.08 0.35 −0.25 0.09 −0.17 0.07 −0.35 0.01
Demographics
 Age 0.02 0.27 −0.02 0.07 −0.03 0.27 −0.07 0.02
 Black 0.26 0.03 0.03 0.48 −0.09 0.50 −0.34 0.17
 Hispanic −0.04 0.71 −0.28 0.19 −0.03 0.80 −0.30 0.23
 Asian 0.47 0.01 0.12 0.83 0.60 0.01 0.14 1.05
 Other 0.18 0.29 −0.15 0.50 0.04 0.83 −0.31 0.38
Family structure
 One biological parent 0.13 0.15 −0.05 0.32 0.30 0.00 0.11 0.48
 Other family structure 0.00 0.98 −0.34 0.35 0.24 0.15 −0.09 0.56
SES
 Parent is a high school graduate 0.39 0.00 0.65 0.12 0.30 0.01 0.53 0.07
 Social support 0.57 <.0001 0.70 0.43 0.84 <.0001 0.98 0.71
Respondent-level building condition
 Poor building condition 0.13 0.11 −0.03 0.29 0.14 0.10 −0.03 0.31

Significant effect estimates at 5% level are bold-faced

b is the model parameter estimate, p is the p-value, and CI is the parameter estimate confidence interval