Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2011 May 20;49(4):379–385. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.01.013

Table 4.

Adjusted main effects neighborhood-level building model predicting standardized depressive symptom score

Male (n=377) Female (418)
b p 95% CI b p 95% CI
Genotype
 SS 0.00 1.00 −0.23 0.23 0.07 0.65 −0.23 0.37
 SL −0.06 0.51 −0.26 0.13 −0.05 0.65 −0.26 0.16
Demographics
 Age 0.01 0.57 −0.04 0.06 −0.01 0.77 −0.06 0.05
 Black 0.23 0.08 −0.02 0.49 0.04 0.83 −0.28 0.35
 Hispanic −0.14 0.29 −0.39 0.12 −0.03 0.85 −0.33 0.28
 Asian 0.45 0.01 0.11 0.80 0.68 0.01 0.17 1.19
 Other 0.40 0.03 0.04 0.76 −0.04 0.83 −0.43 0.35
Family structure
 One biological parent 0.13 0.21 −0.07 0.32 0.30 0.01 0.08 0.52
 Other family structure −0.03 0.86 −0.41 0.34 0.21 0.26 −0.16 0.59
SES and social support
 Parent is a high school graduate 0.39 0.01 0.68 0.10 −0.20 0.16 −0.48 0.08
 Social support 0.57 <0.0001 0.72 0.42 0.86 <0.0001 1.02 0.70
Neighborhood-level building condition
 Poor neighborhood-level building condition 0.29 <0.01 0.12 0.47 0.04 0.70 −0.17 0.25

Significant effect estimates at 5% level are bold-faced

b is the model parameter estimate, p is the p-value, and CI is the parameter estimate confidence interval