Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2011 Jun 17;67(1):226–236. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22988

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Population derived VIFs using Gd-DTPA (N = 11) (a) and P846 (N = 9) (b). P846 had a longer wash-out period than Gd-DTPA due to its larger size. Both Gd-DTPA and P846 have a relatively small standard deviation at the peak (13% and 15%, respectively). However, both have a larger standard deviation at ~5–10 minutes during wash-out equal to 32% and 25%, respectively. Panel (c) illustrates two example VIFind (blue dashed and red solid lines) obtained using Gd-DTPA compared to the VIFpop (solid black line).