Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 21;17(31):3591–3595. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i31.3591

Table 1.

Clinical outcome of endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in Korea (selected) (%)

Author Year n Methods Complete resction Local recurrence Bleeding Perforation
Lee 1996 19 Strip biopsy 37.8 28.6 - -
Cheon 2000 28 Strip biopsy 64.3 3.6 - -
Kim 2000 20 EMR-L 85.0 5.9 0.0 0.0
Seong 2002 35 Strip biopsy 94.3 6.1 - -
Hyun 2003 45 Strip biopsy 55.6 0.0 24.4 0.0
Kim 2005 109 Strip biopsy, EMR-C, EMR-P 67.9 1.4 8.3 2.8
Youn 2006 149 Strip biopsy, EMR-C, EMR-L, ESD 84.6 4.0 22.8 1.3
Kim 2007 514 Strip biopsy, EMR-C, EMR-L, EMR-P, ESD, polypectomy 77.6 6.0 13.8 0.6
Jung 2007 360 EMR-P 82.8 - 10.6 1.1
Jung 2007 264 ESD 87.9 - 9.8 3.8
Kang 2008 456 ESD 80.3 0.0 - -
Park 2008 434 ESD 77.4 1.8 8.1 2.3
Min 2009 103 EMR-P 75.71 0.0 3.9 1.9
Chung 2009 534 ESD 87.71 - 15.6 1.2
Jang 2009 198 ESD 87.9 5.1 7.4 2.9
Lee 2010 806 ESD 93.1 0.4 4.2 3.0
1

Complete en bloc resction rate; EMR-C: Endoscopic mucosal resection using a transparent cap; EMR-P: Endoscopic mucosal resection with precutting; EMR-L: Endoscopic mucosal resection with band ligation; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection.