Table 4.

Multivariate random intercept logistic regression models: adjusted effects of perception variables after adding partner type and woman’s HIV status

	Protected vaginal sex (n = 1,667 individuals, 3,022a events)
	OR	95% CI
Partner HIV status (ref = negative)
Partner is HIV positive	1.83	0.73–4.55
Do not know partner HIV status	1.18	0.86–1.60
Partner type (ref = not main partner)
Main partner	0.13b	0.09–0.17
Woman’s HIV statusc (ref = HIV negative)
HIV positive	3.74b	1.64–8.53
Do not know HIV status	0.65d	0.45–0.92
Partner bisexuality (ref = not bisexual)
Partner is bisexual	0.72	0.46–1.14
Do not know if partner is bisexual	1.36	0.93–1.98
Partner type (ref = not main partner)
Main partner	0.13b	0.09–0.17
Woman’s HIV statusc
HIV positive	4.25b	1.91–9.49
Do not know HIV status	0.69b	0.49–0.96
Partner concurrency (ref = no concurrent partners)
Partner has concurrent partners	0.94	0.69–1.29
Do not know if partner has concurrent partners	1.36	0.89 – 2.09
Partner type (ref = not main partner)
Main partner	0.13b	0.09–0.18

^a n is lower than total number of events due to missing data

^b p < 0.01

^cWald test: p < 0.01

^d p < 0.05