Table 2.
Antecedents’ of the use of sexually explicit internet material
| DV = Use SEIM (t2) | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | 90% bca bootstrapped CI | B | SE | 90% bca bootstrapped CI | |
| Use SEIM (t1) | .544 | .018*** | .478/.603 | .542 | .018*** | .481/.594 |
| Female (t1) | −.259 | .035*** | −.327/−.204 | −.264 | .044*** | −.350/−.188 |
| Age (t1) | .000 | .001 | −.002/.001 | |||
| Education (t1) | .014 | .010 | −.002/.031 | .027 | .014* | .007/.055 |
| In relationship (t1) | −.014 | .039 | −.076/.049 | .054 | .056 | −.042/.147 |
| Attachment (t1) | .011 | .021 | −.027/.056 | .016 | .027 | −.039/.079 |
| Sensation seeking (t1) | .048 | .020** | .012/.090 | .043 | .024* | −.005/.094 |
| Life satisfaction (t1) | −.041 | .022* | −.080/−.005 | −.044 | .028 | −.098/.012 |
| Heterosexual orientation (t1) | −.216 | .067*** | −.388/−.093 | −.150 | .095 | −.346/.005 |
| Dev. status (Adult = 1) (t1) | .265 | .264 | −.212/.809 | |||
| Female × Dev. status | −.001 | .070 | −.121/.124 | |||
| Education × Dev. status | −.025 | .022 | −.065/.007 | |||
| Relationship × Dev. status | −.112 | .087 | −.248/.021 | |||
| Attachment × Dev. status | −.020 | .044 | −.111/.062 | |||
| Sensation seeking × Dev. status | .002 | .043 | −.073/.092 | |||
| Life satisfaction × Dev. status | .008 | .045 | −.074/.080 | |||
| Heterosex. orient. × Dev. status | −.137 | .134 | −.437/.138 | |||
| ΔR 2 | .001 | |||||
| Adj. R 2 | .386 | .387 | ||||
SEIM sexually explicit internet material
* p < .05; ** p < .01, *** p < .001 (one-tailed)