Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 16;3(8):162–170. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v3.i8.162

Table 1.

Clinical profiles of the subjects screened by transnasal or transoral endoscopy and clinicopathological characteristics of detected gastric mucosal neoplasia (mean ± SD) n (%)

Subject screened
Total subjects By transnasal EGD By transoral EGD
No. of screened subjects 3324 1382 1942
Age (yr) 53.4 ± 15.4 53.4 ± 15.4 53.5 ± 15.4
Males 1442 (43.4) 684 (49.4)a 758 (39.0)
Smokers 678 (20.4) 267 (19.3) 411 (21.1)
Helicobacter pylori-infected subjects 1202 (40.2) 510 (39.8) 692 (40.5)
CAG-positive subjects 1360 (40.9) 560 (40.5) 800 (41.2)
No. of subjects with gastric neoplasia/DR 55/0.0165 23/0.0166 32/0.0165
Location of neoplasia (U/M/L) 20/15/20 8/7/8 12/8/12
Adenoma cases/DR 12/0.0036 3/0.0022 9/0.0046
Location of adenoma (U/M/L) 2/4/6 0/2/1 2/2/5
Size of adenoma (mm) 10.5 ± 7.0 9.7 ± 4.0 10.8 ± 7.9
Cancer cases/DR 43/0.0129 20/0.0145 23/0.0118
Location of cancer (U/M/L) 18/11/14 8/5/7 10/6/7
Size of cancer (mm) 27.3 ± 16.7 32.6 ± 19.5a 22.3 ± 12.8
Morphological cancer type (I-IIa/IIb/IIc-III/Ad) 12/1/15/13 6/1/5/8 6/0/12/5
With intestinal-type cancer 33 (76.7) 18 (90.0)a 15 (65.2)
Depth of invasion (m/sm/pm-) 20/10/13 5/7/8 15/3/5
With early cancer 30 (69.7) 12 (60.0) 18 (78.3)
a

P < 0.05 vs transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). CAG: Chronic atrophic gastritis; DR: Detection rate; U: Upper third of the stomach; M: Middle third of the stomach; L: Lower third of the stomach.