Table 1.
DNA modification | Correct sequence | Mutations at the modified site, number | Mutations at positions adjacent to the modified site, number | Mutations at the modified site, % | Overall sequence alterations**, % | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G to A | G to C | G to T | Deletion | 5′C to A | 5′C to G | 5′C to T | 3′A deletion | ||||
non- damaged dG | 229 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
γ-HOPdG | 299 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 1*** | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3.5 | 4.2 |
reduced γ-HOPdG | 245 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0.8 | 2.8 |
reduced γ-HOPdG-mediated KWKK crosslink | 311 | 2 | 9 | 17 | 1 | 2**** | 1*** | 2 | 1 | 8.4 | 9.6 |
Site-specifically modified vectors were constructed using either 12-mer or 30-mer inserts.
To calculate percentage, mutations in tandem were counted as one sequence alteration.
tandem with adducted G to T.
1 out of two mutations was in tandem with adducted G to C.