Table 1.
Primary Community Partner Agency/Fiscal Year | No. of Planned Secondary Sites to Be Recruited | No. of Secondary Sites Contacteda | No. of Secondary Sites Participatingb | % of Secondary Sites Contacted That Participated |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | ||||
2007-2008 | 3-5 | 10 | 2 | 20 |
2008-2009 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 17 |
Total | 6-8 | 16 | 3 | 19 |
B | ||||
2007-2008 | 4-6 | 4 | 3 | 75 |
2008-2009 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 25 |
Total | 7-9 | 12 | 5 | 42 |
C | ||||
2007-2008 | 3-5 | 7 | 1 | 14 |
2008-2009 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100 |
Total | 5-7 | 9 | 3 | 33 |
D | ||||
2007-2008 | 4-6 | 14 | 3 | 21 |
2008-2009 | 3 | 10 | 4 | 40 |
Total | 7-9 | 24 | 7 | 29 |
E | ||||
2007-2008 | 3-4 | 3 | 1 | 33 |
2008-2009 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 43 |
Total | 6-7 | 10 | 4 | 40 |
F | ||||
2007-2008 | 5-7 | 21 | 7 | 33 |
2008-2009 | 5-6 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 10-13 | 28 | 7 | 25 |
Subtotal year 1, 2007-2008 | 22-33 | 59 | 17 | 29 |
Subtotal year 2, 2008-2009 | 19-20 | 40 | 12 | 30 |
Total, 2007-2009 | 41-53 | 99 | 29 | 29 |
More secondary sites were contacted than planned because of the lower-than-expected participation rate.
Completed at least 1 worksite wellness assessment.