Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct;179(4):1638–1644. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.06.020

Table 1.

Analysis of EGFR Expression in Gliomas within the Study Cohort

WHO diagnosis All individuals Males Females Median (range) age (years) Mean ± SEM EGFR IHC score EGFR data
EGFR amplification
Negative Weak Moderate Strong
Astrocytoma
 Grade II 61 (8.1) 31 (50.8) 30 (49.2) 48 (20–81) 1.5 ± 0.1 4 (6.6) 30 (49.2) 19 (31.1) 8 (13.1) 3 (4.9)
 Grade III 64 (8.5) 39 (60.9) 25 (39.1) 56 (22–94) 2.2 ± 0.1 1 (1.6) 14 (21.9) 21 (32.8) 28 (43.8) 17 (26.6)
GBM 507 (67.6) 301 (59.4) 206 (40.6) 63 (18–89) 2.4 ± 0.04 12 (2.4) 64 (12.6) 140 (27.6) 291 (57.4) 224 (44.2)
Oligodendroglioma
 Grade II 84 (11.2) 46 (54.8) 38 (45.2) 42 (19–78) 1.8 ± 0.09 7 (8.3) 18 (21.4) 42 (50.0) 17 (20.2) 1 (1.2)
 Grade III 34 (4.5) 23 (67.6) 11 (32.4) 48 (32–80) 2.3 ± 0.1 0 (0) 7 (20.6) 10 (29.4) 17 (50.0) 2 (5.9)
Total 750 (100.0) 440 (58.7) 310 (41.3) 59 (18–94) 2.2 ± 0.03 24 (3.2) 133 (17.7) 232 (30.9) 361 (48.1) 247 (32.9)

Data are given as number (percentage) unless otherwise indicated. A total of 750 cases of diffusely infiltrative glioma were analyzed prospectively for EGFR expression, EGFR amplification, and 1p/19q codeletion (see Materials and Methods).