Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Res. 2011 Jun 22;30(1):28–36. doi: 10.1002/jor.21484

Table II.

Structural and material properties of the defect tissue compared to contralateral shams and age-matched normal PT (mean±SD)

Ultimate Load
(N)
Stiffness
(N/mm)
Ultimate Stress
(MPa)
Modulus
(MPa)
Defect (2-wk, N=12) 1.54±0.81* 3.26±1.50* 4.67±1.99* 32.37±16.17*
Sham (2-wk, N=12) 3.85±0.92 5.26±0.77 14.17±4.06 60.12±20.48
Defect (5-wk, N=12) 2.08±0.70* 4.20±1.96* 7.90±2.53*§ 48.85±24.39
Sham (5-wk, N=12) 3.76±0.76 7.22±0.91 13.80±4.93 79.47±23.51
Defect (8-wk, N=13) 2.00±0.60* 4.23±1.14* 8.01±2.28*§ 50.35±10.79§
Sham (8-wk, N=13) 3.73±0.73 6.38±1.48 17.64±2.91* 90.57±19.18*
Normal PT (N=15) 4.13±0.87 6.78±2.05 11.68±3.38 56.51±18.29
*

significantly different from age-matched Normal PT,

§

significantly different than Defect (2-wk) – bonferroni-corrected (p < 0.006) significant differences are noted above only for comparisons against normal and comparisons among the defect groups over time