Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar;8(1):53–58. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2006.8.1/iamado

Figure 4. Different types of cued target detection (CTD) tasks under nogap (overlap) conditions showing greater attentional cost (difference between double and no-cue conditions) in patients versus controls (F [1 , 24]=6.76, P=0.01) (as also under gap conditions).

Figure 4.