Skip to main content
. 2011 May;6(2):119–140. doi: 10.2174/157488911795933901

Table 2.

Potentiating Effect of Physostigmine and Rivastigmine on AFDX-116 and R(+)-hyoscyamine -induced Analgesia in the Mouse Hot-plate Test.

Licking Latency in Mice (s)
TREATMENT TREATMENT Before After Treatment
Treatment 15 Min 30 Min 45 Min
SALINE SALINE 15.2 ± 1.1 14.7 ± 1.5 13.2 ± 2.0 14.6 ± 1.9
SALINE AFDX-116 16.1 ± 1.2 23.2 ± 2.1* 20.7 ± 1.9* 16.3 ± 1.5
SALINE R-(+)-HYOSCIAMINE 13.9 ± 0.9 24.7 ± 1.9* 22.6 ± 1.7* 17.1 ± 1.8
PHYSOSTIGMINE SALINE 14.8 ± 1.2 25.6 ± 2.6* 21.7 ± 1.9* 19.3 ± 2.0
PHYSOSTIGMINE AFDX-116 15.0 ± 1.1 36.5 ± 1.7* 35.2 ± 1.6* 24.0 ± 1.7*
PHYSOSTIGMINE R-(+)-HYOSCIAMINE 14.3 ± 1.5 39.1 ± 2.4* 36.2 ± 2.3* 26.7 ± 2.8*
RIVASTIGMINE SALINE 14.3 ± 1.1 26.2 ± 2.1* 22.5 ± 1.2* 17.5 ± 1.2
RIVASTIGMINE AFDX-116 13.2 ± 1.7 38.7 ± 2.8* 35.5 ± 2.6* 22.9 ± 1.8*
RIVASTIGMINE R-(+)-HYOSCIAMINE 14.5 ± 1.2 37.0 ± 3.2* 34.6 ± 2.9* 26.5 ± 1.6*

AFDX-116 (0.1μg i.c.v.) and R-(+)-hyoscyamine (10μg i.c.v.) were administered 30 min after rivastigmine (0.75mg kg-1 s.c ) and physostigmine (0.075mg kg-1 s.c). There were at least 12 mice per group.

*

P < 0.01, versus control mice.

ˆ

P < 0.01 versus saline AFDX/R-(+)-hyosciamine [40].